A Great Prophet Has Arisen (Luke 7:11-17)

Luke 7

Peter Paul Rubens, Feast in the House of Simon the Pharisee, ca. 1618–1620, oil on canvas, 189 × 254.5 cm, State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg. Entered the Hermitage in 1779 from the Walpole collection, Houghton Hall, England. Digital collection no. 48168. Wikimedia Commons, public domain.

A Link to Luke 7 (ESV)

A Great Prophet Has Arisen (7:11-17)

When the prophet Elijah arrived in Zarephath, he met a widow whose only son had died. He took the boy upstairs, stretched himself over him three times, and cried out to the Lord. The boy was restored to life, and Elijah returned him to his mother.

And Elijah took the child and brought him down from the upper chamber into the house and delivered him to his mother. And Elijah said, “See, your son lives.” (1 Kgs 17:23)

In response, the widow says she now knows the man of God is genuine and that the word of the Lord in his mouth is truth (17:24). The raising of a widow’s only son is the sign that confirms Elijah as a prophet.

Luke is familiar with this story, and he expects his readers to be familiar with it too. As Jesus nears the town of Nain, a dead man is being carried out, “the only son of his mother, and she was a widow” (7:12). Each term carries weight. Only son. Mother. Widow. Luke has prepared the scene for an Elijah-like moment, and the funeral at the gate highlights the woman’s plight. She has already lost her husband, and now she has lost her only son, her only means of support in a world that offers no safety for a widow alone.

Jesus shows compassion on her, touches the bier, and speaks. The dead man sits up and starts talking. Then Luke adds a line that clears up any doubt about his intention:

And he gave him to his mother. (7:15)

In Greek, the clause matches the translation of 1 Kings 17:23 exactly. Luke is not just telling a similar story; he is quoting the Elijah account at the exact moment of restoration, linking the two scenes so that the reader cannot miss the connection.

The crowd reaches the obvious conclusion. “A great prophet has arisen among us!” (7:16). They are right, but not quite right enough. Elijah stretched himself over the boy and begged the Lord to act. Jesus simply speaks, and the dead obey. The prophet of Zarephath interceded with God. The one at Nain commands with the authority of God.

This is what the allusion is meant to reveal. Jesus was a prophet, but he was also much more than a prophet. The widow of Zarephath understood that a true prophet’s word is the word of the Lord. At Nain, that word is spoken by the one who needs no intermediary because death already answers to his voice.

---

Tears and Ointment (7:36-50)

The scene is awkward from the start.

A Pharisee invites Jesus to dinner, and an uninvited woman walks in off the street. Luke describes her only as “a woman of the city, who was a sinner” (Luke 7:37). She comes intending to anoint Jesus, but when she finds herself at his feet, she is overwhelmed before she can open the jar. Tears fall first. She wipes them away with her loosened hair, something no respectable woman would do in public, kisses his feet, and finally does what she came for.

Western tradition has long identified the woman as Mary Magdalene, but this identification stems from a single source: a homily by Pope Gregory the Great in 591 (Hom. ev. 33). In that homily, he conflated this unnamed woman, Mary Magdalene (who is introduced just a few verses later in Luke 8:2), and Mary of Bethany (John 12:1–3). Luke offers no indication that they are the same person, and his lack of a name here is almost certainly deliberate.

Simon the Pharisee watches silently and concludes that Jesus cannot be a prophet because he failed to recognize the woman’s character (7:39). The irony is immediate: Jesus demonstrates prophetic insight by reading Simon’s unspoken thoughts, and then shares a parable found only in Luke. Two debtors owe a moneylender: one five hundred denarii, the other fifty. Neither can pay; both are forgiven. Which one loves more? Simon offers the obvious answer, and Jesus turns it back on him.

Then comes 7:47. The Greek word ὅτι (hoti), translated as “for,” can function causally (”because she loved, she is forgiven”) or inferentially (“as proved by the fact that she loved, she is forgiven”). The parable settles the question. The debt is canceled before any love is expressed. Her extravagant devotion is proof that a great debt has already been canceled, not the payment that cancels it.

Jesus enumerates what Simon failed to provide: no water, no kiss, no oil (7:44–46). The omissions were a social failure nearly as striking as the woman’s loosened hair. Those who have reckoned honestly with the size of their debt love extravagantly; those who have not, love little. Simon has not yet looked at his own ledger.

Jesus turns to the woman and says:

“Your sins are forgiven... Your faith has saved you; go in peace” (7:48, 50).

She never speaks. Her whole argument is made in ointment and tears.